NA
Report
- Report Number
- 1036844-2010-00075
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- March 19, 2010
- Date of Event
- February 16, 2010
- Report Date
- March 19, 2010
- Manufacturer
- ARROW INTL., INC.
- Product Code
- DQO
- PMA / PMN Number
- UNK
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA
- Reporter Occupation
- NURSE
Narratives
(B) (4). FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE.
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THE SPRING WIRE GUIDE (SWG) UNRAVELED AND BECAME STUCK INSIDE PATIENT (PT). AS A RESULT, THE USER HAD TO TAKE EXTRA STEPS TO REMOVE THE SWG FROM THE PT. PER AN E-MAIL ON 03/04/2010, THE CATHETER WAS INSERTED BY THE MD IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PT IS NOW DECEASED, BUT CUSTOMER STATED THE CAUSE OF DEATH WAS NOT DUE TO THIS SITUATION. THE CORONER REPORTS SEPSIS AND RESPIRATORY FAILURE AS THE CAUSE OF DEATH. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY WHETHER THERE WAS A DOUBLE LUMEN OR A TRIPLE LUMEN PLACED IN THIS PT. THE HOSPITAL DID NOT KEEP THE PACKAGING, THEREFORE, THE PRODUCT NUMBER AND LOT NUMBER ARE BOTH UNK AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER, THE HOSPITAL WILL AT LEAST PROVIDE THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE WITH THE LOT NUMBER THAT IS CURRENTLY IN THE HOSPITAL. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT AN X-RAY SUGGESTED THAT THE SWG HAD LOOPED AROUND AT THE END. HOWEVER, WHEN AN ULTRASOUND WAS PERFORMED, IT DID NOT SHOW THIS. IT DID SHOW THAT THE SWG WAS SITUATED IN TISSUE. THE ULTRASOUND ALSO SHOWED THAT THE VESSEL WAS OKAY. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED ON 02/16/2010 BY A SURGEON IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU). THE INSERTING PHYSICIAN DESCRIBED THE SITUATION, THE STEPS HE TOOK AND WHEN HE FIRST NOTICED THAT HE ENCOUNTERED A PROBLEM: INSERTED WIRE THROUGH THE ARROW RAULERSON SYRINGE (ARS) AND NEEDLE, AND NOTICED RESISTANCE. AFTER REMOVING SYRINGE/NEEDLE FROM SWG, THREADED THE DILATOR OVER SWG AND INTO PT. THIS DID NOT HAVE THE SAME FEELING IN TERMS OF SOUND/FEELING THAT IT NORMALLY MAKES. AFTER REMOVING THE DILATOR, HE STATED THAT HE ATTEMPTED TO INSERT THE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER (CVC), BUT HAD DIFFICULTY, SO REMOVED THE CVC. HE THEN TRIED TO REMOVE THE SWG, BUT HAD DIFFICULTY AND NOTICED THAT THE SWG HAD "DECOILED." HE COULD SEE THIS AT THE ENTRY SITE IN THE PATIENT. AT THIS POINT, HE WAS NERVOUS TO ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE SWG, SO THE WIRE WAS SECURED SO THAT IT WOULDN'T FLY AROUND AND PT WAS MOVED TO THE ICU. IN THE ICU, A SURGEON DID REMOVE THE SWG SUCCESSFULLY.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | ADULT MULTI-LUMEN CATHETER PRODUCTS | DQO | ARROW INTL., INC. | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNK | Death |