UNK - NAIL HEAD ELEMENTS: HELICAL BLADE
Report
- Report Number
- 8030965-2023-00422
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- January 11, 2023
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES GMBH
- Product Code
- HSB
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CH
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
DEPUY SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THIS REPORT MAY BE BASED ON INFORMATION WHICH DEPUY SYNTHES HAS NOT BEEN ABLE TO INVESTIGATE OR VERIFY PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY FDA, DEPUY SYNTHES OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE DEVICE, DEPUY SYNTHES, OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. IF THE INFORMATION IS UNKNOWN, NOT AVAILABLE OR DOES NOT APPLY, THE SECTION/FIELD OF THE FORM IS LEFT BLANK. THIS REPORT IS FOR AN UNKNOWN NAIL HEAD ELEMENTS: HELICAL BLADE/UNKNOWN LOT. PART AND LOT NUMBERS ARE UNKNOWN; UDI NUMBER IS UNKNOWN. COMPLAINANT PART IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR MANUFACTURER REVIEW/INVESTIGATION. INITIAL REPORTER NAME AND ADDRESS: (B)(6). WITHOUT A LOT NUMBER THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS REVIEW COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT NO CORRECTIVE AND/OR PREVENTATIVE ACTION IS PROPOSED. THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR AND MONITORED VIA POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS MADE AVAILABLE, THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE UPDATED AS APPLICABLE. DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN CHINA AS FOLLOWS: THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING JOURNAL ARTICLE: SHI, T. ET AL. (2022), CONVERSION HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING STANDARD AND LONG STEMS AFTER FAILED INTERNAL FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES, ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, VOL. 9999, PAGES 1-9 (CHINA). THE PURPOSE OF THIS MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY WAS: (I) TO EVALUATE THE RESULTS, TECHNICAL PROBLEMS, AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONVERSION HIP ARTHROPLASTY (CHA) FOLLOWING FAILED INTERNAL FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES (FIF-ITF) PATIENTS IN MULTICENTERS; AND (II) TO COMPARE THE CLINICAL EFFICIENCY OF STANDARD AND LONG STEMS IN THIS OPERATION. THIS RETROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER STUDY ENROLLED 31 TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY (THA) AND 23 HEMIARTHROPLASTIES (HA) CASES (30 WOMEN, 24 MEN; MEAN AGE 76 YEARS) AFTER FIF-ITF BETWEEN 2012 AND 2019, DIVIDED INTO TWO GROUPS: STANDARD STEM GROUP (N = 20) AND LONG STEM GROUP (N = 34). THE INITIAL INTERNAL FIXATION INCLUDES 38 CASES OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTI-ROTATION (PFNA), EIGHT CASES OF THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW (DHS), AND EIGHT CASES OF LOCKING PROXIMAL FEMORAL PLATE (LPFP). THE ARTICLE DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY WHICH SYNTHES DEVICE (PFNA OR DHS) IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADVERSE EVENT. (N=38) FAILURE OF FIXATION (CUT OUT). (N=7) NONUNION. (N=9) AVASCULAR NECROSIS OR POSTTRAUMATIC OSTEOARTHRITIS. A 70-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT WITH A RIGHT COMMINUTED INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURE WAS TREATED WITH PFNA AND RECEIVED THA AFTER FAILED INTERNAL FIXATION. THIS REPORT IS FOR AN UNKNOWN SYNTHES DHS AND PFNA. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 4 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1178612 | UNK - NAIL HEAD ELEMENTS: HELICAL BLADE | ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY | HSB | SYNTHES GMBH |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown | Required Intervention |