LIGUORY NASAL BILIARY DRAINAGE SET RADIOPAQUE TIP
Report
- Report Number
- 3001845648-2022-00488
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 28, 2022
- Date of Event
- June 29, 2022
- Report Date
- November 16, 2022
- Manufacturer
- COOK IRELAND LTD
- Product Code
- FGE
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
- Health Professional
- N
Narratives
510K: K180868. INVESTIGATION IS STILL PENDING, A FOLLOW UP MDR WILL BE SUBMITTED TO INCLUDE THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS.
510K: K180868. DEVICE EVALUATION THE ENBD-7-LIGUORY-RT DEVICE OF UNKNOWN LOT NUMBER INVOLVED IN THIS COMPLAINT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION. WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, A DOCUMENT-BASED INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED. DOCUMENT REVIEW AS THE LOT NUMBER OF THE COMPLAINT STENTS ARE UNKNOWN, A REVIEW OF THE RELEVANT MANUFACTURING RECORDS CANNOT BE CONDUCTED. HOWEVER, PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION ENBD-7-LIGUORY-RT DEVICES ARE SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL INSPECTION AND FUNCTIONAL CHECKS TO ENSURE DEVICE INTEGRITY. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THE USER DID NOT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU0129-0). ROOT CAUSE REVIEW A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED FROM THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. A POSSIBLE ROOT CAUSE COULD BE ATTRIBUTED TO DIFFICULT PATIENT ANATOMY. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A DIFFICULT PATIENT ANATOMY CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO DIFFICULTY DURING ADVANCEMENT WHICH PREVENTED THE USER CROSSING THE STRICTURE WITH THE DEVICE. SUMMARY THE COMPLAINT IS CONFIRMED BASED ON CUSTOMER TESTIMONY. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. COMPLAINTS OF THIS NATURE WILL CONTINUE TO BE MONITORED FOR POTENTIAL EMERGING TRENDS.
AFTER STONE REMOVAL, THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO INSERT ENBD CATHETER TO DRAIN CBD AND IHD. HOWEVER, ENBD CATHETER COULDN'T PUSH FORWARD TO(OR DIDN'T GET THROUGH) INTRA HEPATIC DUCT. THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED CATHETER SEVERAL TIMES, BUT FAILED. SO HE CHANGED ENBD-5-LIGUORY-RT. DID ANY SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY? NO. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE(S)? NO. WERE THERE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE ADVERSE EFFECT(S)? NO. 1.1.2 WHAT WAS FLUSHED THROUGH THE DEVICE (WATER, SALINE, CONTRAST, ETC.)? SALINE USED. 1.1.3 WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER OF THE WIRE GUIDE USED WITH THIS DEVICE? TAEWOONG OPTIMOS WIRE 0.035 STRAIGHT. 1.1.4 IF NOT WITH THE DEVICE IN QUESTION, HOW WAS THE PROCEDURE FINISHED? HE USED ENBD-5 OF COOK.. 1.2 FOR COMPLAINTS OCCURRING DURING PLACEMENT AND/OR USE, ALSO ASK: 1.2.1 WHAT IS THE ENDOSCOPE MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NUMBER THAT WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE? OLYMPUS, TJF-260. 1.2.2 WAS RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE WIRE GUIDE INTO POSITION? NO, IT WASN'T. 1.2.3 WAS RESISTANCE ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DRAINAGE CATHETER INTO POSITION? YES, IT WAS. 1.2.4 WAS A DRAINAGE CATHETER LOOP PLACED IN THE DESCENDING PORTION OF THE DUODENUM? NO, IT WASN'T. 1.2.5 AFTER PLACEMENT, WAS DRAINAGE CATHETER POSITION VERIFIED? IT DIDN'T PLACE AT ALL. 1.2.5.1 IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE HOW. 1.2.6 PLEASE ESTIMATE AMOUNT OF TIME THE DRAINAGE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE PRIOR TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ABOUT 10 MINUTES. 1.2.7 DID ANY SECTION OF THE DEVICE DETACH INSIDE THE ENDOSCOPE OR PATIENT? NO.
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION ON (B)(6)2022.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2333803 | LIGUORY NASAL BILIARY DRAINAGE SET RADIOPAQUE TIP | FGE CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC | FGE | COOK IRELAND LTD | UNKNOWN |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unknown |