FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

NERIVIO

MDR report key: 14853148 · Received June 29, 2022

Report

Report Number
3015379717-2022-00001
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
June 29, 2022
Date of Event
November 1, 2021
Report Date
February 12, 2022
Manufacturer
THERANICA BIO-ELECTRONICS LTD.
Product Code
QGT
UDI-DI
07290017578026
PMA / PMN Number
K203181
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
NJ, US
Reporter Occupation
003

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THE NERIVIO DEVICE IS A DISTAL TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATOR THAT STIMULATES PERIPHERAL NERVES OF THE UPPER ARM, INDICATED FOR ACUTE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE WITH OR WITHOUT AURA. THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN EVALUATED IN PREGNANT PATIENTS BEFORE, AND PREGNANCY IS MENTIONED AS A PRECAUTION IN THE DEVICE USER MANUAL. THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER NEUROSTIMULATION DEVICES APPROVED FOR MIGRAINE, ALL OF THEM WERE NOT EVALUATED IN PREGNANT PATIENTS AND CONTAIN THE SAME PRECAUTION. IN GENERAL, TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS) DEVICES ARE SAFE, WELL TOLERATED AND USE A WELL-ESTABLISHED TECHNOLOGY THAT IS HIGHLY ACCEPTED IN THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY. THERANICA CONSULTED A MEMBER OF OUR MEDICAL ADVISORY BOARD (DR. DAVID YARNITSKY, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY AT RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER, ISRAEL) AND AN ADDITIONAL CONSULTANT (DR RONI SHARON, A USA BOARD CERTIFIED NEUROLOGIST AFFILIATED AT BALLIN MMORIAL HOSPITAL NEW YORK, NY, AND DIRECTOR OF HEADACHE & FACIAL PAIN AT SHEBA HOSPITAL, ISRAEL) REGARDING THIS EVENT. BOTH DID NOT FORESEE A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TREATMENTS WITH THE NERIVIO DEVICE AND THE ADVERSE EVENT. IN ADDITION, DR SHARON HAS ALREADY PRESCRIBED THE NERIVIO TO PREGNANT WOMEN BEFORE AND CONDUCT A FOLLOW UP FOR THESE PATIENTS, INCLUDING POST LABOR MONITORING AND FOLLOW UP FOR THE NEWBORNS. DR SHARON REPORTED THAT HE DID NOT OBSERVED ANY ADVERSE EVENT OR ANY ISSUES WITH THESE NEWBORNS. IN THIS SPECIFIC EVENT, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT CONNECTS THE DEVICE OR THE TECHNOLOGY TO THE EVENT. OUR ATTEMPT TO RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT WAS REFUSED BY THE PATIENT. IN ADDITION, THE PATIENT HERSELF STATED THAT SHE CANNOT SEE A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TREATMENT AND THE EVENT. LITERATURE REVIEW REGARDING USAGE OF TENS DURING PREGNANCY REVEALED THAT TENS IS AN ACCEPTED AS A SAFE TREATMENT DURING PREGNANCY; 1 - KESKIN EA ET. AL. TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION IMPROVES LOW BACK PAIN DURING PREGNANCY. GYNECOL OBSTET INVEST. 2012;74(1):76-83 2 - CROTHERS E ET. AL. SAFE USE OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN DURING PREGNANCY. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF CHARTERED PHYSIOTHERAPISTS IN WOMEN'S HEALTH (ACPWH). 2012, 111, 22-26 3 - KOUKOULITHRAS I ET. AL. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-PHARMACEUTICAL INTERVENTIONS UPON PREGNANCY-RELATED LOW BACK PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. CUREUS. 2021 JAN 30;13(1):E13011. GIVEN THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE COMPANY BELIEVES THERE IS NO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EVENT AND THE DEVICE. HOWEVER, WE ARE FILING THIS EVENT IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION TO INFORM POTENTIAL USERS AND ALLOW USERS TO CONSIDER THE USE OF NERIVIO DURING PREGNANCY.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

THERANICA USA WAS NOTIFIED BY THE PATIENT THAT DURING HER PREGNANCY, SHE CONTINUED TO USE THE NERIVIO DEVICE WHEN HAVING MIGRAINES, AFTER CONSULTING WITH A FEW PHYSICIANS. DURING HER PREGNANCY SHE HAD A MISCARRIAGE. THE PATIENT WAS INITIALLY PPROACHED BY THERANICA MARKETING PERSON, WHO ASKED THE PATIENT FOR A DEVICE TESTIMONIAL, FOLLOWING A POSITIVE FEEDBACK POST THE PATIENT PUBLISHED REGARDING THE EFFECT OF THE NERIVIO DEVICE ON HER MIGRAINE. THE PATIENT AGREED TO GIVE A TESTIMONIAL AND WAS TOLD BY THE MARKETING PERSON THAT SHE BE WILL CONTACTED AGAIN TO COORDINATE THE TESTIMONIAL. WHEN THE PATIENT WAS RE-CONTACTED FOR THE TESTIMONIAL, SHE TOLD THE MARKETING PERSON OF HER MISCARRIAGE AND THAT SHE IS NO LONGER FEELS COMFORTABLE TO PROMOTE THE DEVICE. THE PATIENT ASKED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE COMPANY'S MAILING LIST. THE MARKETING PERSON REPORTED THE EVENT TO THE COMPANY ON (B)(6) 2022. FOLLOWING THIS INFORMATION, THE COMPANY SENT AN E-MAIL TO THE PATIENT AND ASKED HER PERMISSION TO CALL HER IN ORDER TO COLLECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE REQUEST WAS SENT ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT REPLIED THE FOLLOWING BY MAIL: "THERE ARE MANY REASONS FOR MISCARRIAGE, NAMELY GENETIC VIABILITY OF THE EMBRYO, AND I WAS 39 AT THE TIME OF LOSS. THERE IS NO WAY TO KNOW IF NERIVIO PLAYED ANY PART IN THE MISCARRIAGE. BUT BLAMING ONE'S SELF IS AN UNAVOIDABLE PART OF NAVIGATING THE LOSS. I USED THE DEVICE KNOWING I WAS PREGNANT. I INQUIRED WITH A SEVERAL DOCTORS AND THE PRO PHARMACY PHARMACIST TWICE, BUT I STILL TOOK THAT RISK OF MY OWN ACCORD. I HAD THREE HEALTHY PREGNANCIES AND LIVE BIRTHS PRIOR TO THIS LOSS AND USE OF THE NERIVIO DEVICE WAS THE ONLY VARIATION I MADE TO MY NORMAL PREGNANCY ROUTINES. THE PREGNANCY WAS UNEXPECTED AND, GIVEN MY AGE, I DO NOT ANTICIPATE CONCEIVING AGAIN, BUT IF I WERE TO, I WOULD ABSTAIN FROM USING NERIVIO WHILE PREGNANT. PERHAPS IT PLAYED NO PART, BUT THERE'S NO WAY TO KNOW. I WOULD NOT TAKE THE RISK AGAIN. IT'S A SHAME THOUGH, PREGNANT WOMEN WHO STRUGGLE WITH MIGRAINE COULD REALLY USE MORE SAFE RESOURCES. I'D PREFER NOT TO FIELD A CALL ON THE MATTER THOUGH. THANK YOU, EL-GA" . THERANICA RESPECTED THE PATIENT REPLY AND DID NOT CONTACT HER AGAIN.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
2410891 NERIVIO NERIVIO QGT THERANICA BIO-ELECTRONICS LTD. FGD000075 2106 07290017578026

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 39 YR Female Other