FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE

MDR report key: 13058202 · Received December 22, 2021

Report

Report Number
2015691-2021-06969
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
December 22, 2021
Date of Event
November 22, 2021
Report Date
January 14, 2022
Manufacturer
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
Product Code
NPT
PMA / PMN Number
P140031
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
US
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN
Health Professional
Yes

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THIS IS TWO OF TWO MANUFACTURER REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS CASE. PLEASE REFERENCE RELATED MANUFACTURER REPORT NO: 2015691-2021-XXXXX. (MDR# 2021-20337-02). PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), PERMANENT OR TRANSIENT NEUROLOGICAL EVENTS INCLUDING STROKE ARE POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TAVR PROCEDURE AND THE USE OF THE EDWARDS THV DEVICES. ACCORDING TO LITERATURE REVIEW, AND AS DOCUMENTED IN A CLINICAL TECHNICAL SUMMARY WRITTEN BY EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, STROKE IS RECOGNIZED IN THE LITERATURE AS A WELL-KNOWN COMPLICATION IN A SMALL NUMBER OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING TAVR. RISK FACTORS CORRELATING WITH A NUMBER OF PATIENT CO-MORBIDITIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. ALTHOUGH IN MANY CASES THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS UNABLE TO BE DETERMINED, STROKES DURING TAVR ARE UNDOUBTEDLY MULTIFACTORIAL, THE DOMINANT ETIOLOGY LIKELY BEING INTRA-PROCEDURE EMBOLIC EVENTS. A TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER STUDY DURING TAVR DEMONSTRATED THAT THE MAJORITY OF PROCEDURAL EMBOLIC EVENTS OCCURRED DURING BALLOON VALVULOPLASTY, MANIPULATION OF CATHETERS ACROSS THE AORTIC VALVE, AND VALVE IMPLANTATION. AN ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VALVE SURGERY REVEALED FOUR BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND TWO PROCEDURAL EVENTS THAT WERE ASSOCIATED WITH EARLY POST-PROCEDURE STROKE: FEMALE SEX, EF < 30%, DIABETES, AGE OLDER THAN 70 YEARS, BYPASS PROCEDURE TIME> 120 MIN, AND CALCIFICATION OF THE ASCENDING AORTA. PREDICTORS OF LATE STROKE HAVE INCLUDED FEMALE SEX, AGE OLDER THAN 75 YEARS, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, AND A HISTORY OF OR CURRENT SMOKING. THERE WERE NO IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF LATE STROKES BETWEEN TAVR AND AVR PATIENTS. AFTER TAVR, THERE APPEARS TO BE A MORE SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF EARLY STROKES OCCURRING < 24 H POST-PROCEDURE, BUT TAVR PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE CO MORBIDITIES ARE PROBABLY AT HIGHER RISK OF BOTH EARLY AND LATE STROKES. IN THIS CASE, THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OR INDICATION A DEVICE MALFUNCTION CONTRIBUTED TO THIS ADVERSE EVENT. THE CAUSE OF THE STROKE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. HOWEVER, IT MAY HAVE BEEN RELATED TO THE MECHANISMS DESCRIBED ABOVE. THE IFU AND TRAINING MANUALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO INADEQUACIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH REGARDS TO WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND THE DIRECTIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE DEVICE. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS, AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS PART OF THIS MONTHLY REVIEW. NO CORRECTIVE OR PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THE FOLLOWING REPORT FIELDS HAVE BEEN UPDATED DUE TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: G3. THIS IS TWO OF TWO MANUFACTURER REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS CASE. PLEASE REFERENCE RELATED MANUFACTURER REPORT NO: 2015691-2021-06969. (MDR# (B)(4)).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THIS IS TWO OF TWO MANUFACTURER REPORTS BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS CASE. PLEASE REFERENCE RELATED MANUFACTURER REPORT NO: 2015691-2021-XXXXX. (MDR# 2021-20337-02). PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), PERMANENT OR TRANSIENT NEUROLOGICAL EVENTS INCLUDING STROKE ARE POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TAVR PROCEDURE AND THE USE OF THE EDWARDS THV DEVICES. ACCORDING TO LITERATURE REVIEW, AND AS DOCUMENTED IN A CLINICAL TECHNICAL SUMMARY WRITTEN BY EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, STROKE IS RECOGNIZED IN THE LITERATURE AS A WELL-KNOWN COMPLICATION IN A SMALL NUMBER OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING TAVR. RISK FACTORS CORRELATING WITH A NUMBER OF PATIENT CO-MORBIDITIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED. ALTHOUGH IN MANY CASES THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE EVENT IS UNABLE TO BE DETERMINED, STROKES DURING TAVR ARE UNDOUBTEDLY MULTIFACTORIAL, THE DOMINANT ETIOLOGY LIKELY BEING INTRA-PROCEDURE EMBOLIC EVENTS. A TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER STUDY DURING TAVR DEMONSTRATED THAT THE MAJORITY OF PROCEDURAL EMBOLIC EVENTS OCCURRED DURING BALLOON VALVULOPLASTY, MANIPULATION OF CATHETERS ACROSS THE AORTIC VALVE, AND VALVE IMPLANTATION. AN ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VALVE SURGERY REVEALED FOUR BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS AND TWO PROCEDURAL EVENTS THAT WERE ASSOCIATED WITH EARLY POST-PROCEDURE STROKE: FEMALE SEX, EF < 30%, DIABETES, AGE OLDER THAN 70 YEARS, BYPASS PROCEDURE TIME> 120 MIN, AND CALCIFICATION OF THE ASCENDING AORTA. PREDICTORS OF LATE STROKE HAVE INCLUDED FEMALE SEX, AGE OLDER THAN 75 YEARS, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, AND A HISTORY OF OR CURRENT SMOKING. THERE WERE NO IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES IN THE FREQUENCY OF LATE STROKES BETWEEN TAVR AND AVR PATIENTS. AFTER TAVR, THERE APPEARS TO BE A MORE SIGNIFICANT PROPORTION OF EARLY STROKES OCCURRING < 24 H POST-PROCEDURE, BUT TAVR PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE CO MORBIDITIES ARE PROBABLY AT HIGHER RISK OF BOTH EARLY AND LATE STROKES. IN THIS CASE, THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OR INDICATION A DEVICE MALFUNCTION CONTRIBUTED TO THIS ADVERSE EVENT. THE CAUSE OF THE STROKE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. HOWEVER, IT MAY HAVE BEEN RELATED TO THE MECHANISMS DESCRIBED ABOVE. THE IFU AND TRAINING MANUALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO INADEQUACIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH REGARDS TO WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND THE DIRECTIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE DEVICE. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS, AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS PART OF THIS MONTHLY REVIEW. NO CORRECTIVE OR PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT PATIENT EXPIRED ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY (POD) 33 DUE TO DETERIORATION OF GENERAL CONDITION CAUSED BY INFECTION.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

AS REPORTED BY AN EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES AFFILIATE IN (B)(6), POST TRANSFEMORAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR) FOR THE NATIVE AORTIC POSITION, A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SHOWED AN OBSERVATION OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL WITH TRACHEAL CANNULA SINCE CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL DID NOT RECOVER AS OF 14 DAYS POST PROCEDURE.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

AS REPORTED BY AN EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES AFFILIATE IN (B)(6), POST TRANSFEMORAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR) FOR THE NATIVE AORTIC POSITION, A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SHOWED AN OBSERVATION OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL WITH TRACHEAL CANNULA SINCE CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL DID NOT RECOVER AS OF 14 DAYS POST PROCEDURE.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

AS REPORTED BY AN EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES AFFILIATE IN JAPAN, POST TRANSFEMORAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR) FOR THE NATIVE AORTIC POSITION, A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SHOWED AN OBSERVATION OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL WITH TRACHEAL CANNULA SINCE CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL DID NOT RECOVER AS OF 14 DAYS POST PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT EXPIRED ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY (POD) 33 DUE TO DETERIORATION OF GENERAL CONDITION CAUSED BY INFECTION.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1966515 EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED NPT EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES 9600TFX23J NA

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 86 YR Female Hospitalization