ELLIPSYS CATHETER
Report
- Report Number
- 3014251914-2021-00003
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 11, 2021
- Date of Event
- February 3, 2021
- Report Date
- October 11, 2021
- Manufacturer
- AVENU MEDICAL
- Product Code
- PQK
- PMA / PMN Number
- K191114
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FR
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
TITLE: COMPARISON OF SURGICAL VERSUS PERCUTANEOUSLY CREATED ARTERIOVENOUS HEMODIALYSIS FISTULAS AUTHOR: GHAZI HARIKA, ALEXANDROS MALLIOS, MAHMOUD ALLOUACHE JOURNAL: JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY YEAR: 2021 VOL/ISSUE: 74(1) REF: 10.1016/J.JVS.2020.12.086. AGE: AVERAGE AGE. SEX: MAJORITY GENDER. DATE OF EVENT: DATE OF PUBLICATION. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
A JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS SUBMITTED DETAILING A SINGLE-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY TO COMPARE THE RESULTS BETWEEN PERCUTANEOUS ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAS (PAVFS) CREATED WITH THE ELLIPSYS DEVICE. 107 PATIENTS UNDERWENT P-AVF CREATION WITH THE ELLIPSYS SYSTEM, AND AN EQUAL NUMBER OF PATIENT¿S UNDERWENT SURGICAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAS (S-AVFS) CREATION. THE PRIMARY ENDPOINTS INCLUDED THE MATURATION AND PATENCY RATES. THE SECONDARY ENDPOINTS WERE REINTERVENTION, RISK OF INFECTION, AND THE INCIDENCE OF STEAL SYNDROME AND ANEURYSM FORMATION. THE MATURATION RATE AT 6 WEEKS WAS HIGHER FOR THE PAVFS. NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WERE FOUND BETWEEN THE P-AVFS AND ELBOW SURGICAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (E-AVFS). NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES WERE FOUND IN THE SECONDARY PATENCY RATES AT 12 (90% VS 91%) AND 24 (88% VS 91%) MONTHS. AT 12 MONTHS, THE PATIENTS WITH A P-AVF HAD REQUIRED MORE SECONDARY PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTIONS THAN HAD PATIENTS WITH AN S-AVF (41% VS 4%) BUT FEWER OPEN SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS. AT 24 MONTHS, THE S-AVF AND P-AVF GROUPS HAD UNDERGONE A SIMILAR PROPORTION OF PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTIONS (42% VS 53%).HOWEVER, THE S-AVF GROUP HAD MAINTAINED THE MORE FREQUENT REQUIREMENT FOR OPERATIVE INTERVENTIONS (36% VS 17%). A COMPARISON OF P-AVFS AND E-AVFS SHOWED NOTABLE DIFFERENCES AT 6 MONTHS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR PERCUTANEOUS AND SURGICAL (12% VS 40%) INTERVENTIONS (INCLUDING SUPERFICIALIZATION). AT 24 MONTHS, THE E-AVFS HAD CONTINUED TO REQUIRE A GREATER RATE OF SURGICAL REVISION (49% VS 18%). WOUND HEALING ISSUES AND INFECTIONS WERE HIGHER FOR THE S-AVF GROUP (9% VS 0.9%). ONE PATIENT WITH A P-AVF HAD EXPERIENCED WOUND SEPARATION AFTER SUPERFICIALIZATION. THE AUTHORS CONCLUDED AVFS CREATED PERCUTANEOUSLY WITH THE ELLIPSYS SYSTEM HAD BETTER MATURATION AND PATENCY RATES SIMILAR TO THOSE OF S-AVFS CONSTRUCTED BY AN EXPERIENCED VASCULAR SURGERY GROUP WITH EXCELLENT SURGICAL OUTCOMES. THE ELLIPSYS CREATED P-AVFS HAD A LOWER RISK OF INFECTION, HAIDI, AND ANEURYSM FORMATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1506825 | ELLIPSYS CATHETER | PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER FOR CREATION OF AN ARTER | PQK | AVENU MEDICAL |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 YR | Required Intervention |