UNK - CONSTRUCTS: LCP
Report
- Report Number
- 8030965-2021-06674
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 13, 2021
- Report Date
- July 16, 2021
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES GMBH
- Product Code
- HRS
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TW
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
THIS REPORT IS FOR AN UNKNOWN LCP CONSTRUCT/UNKNOWN LOT. PART AND LOT NUMBER ARE UNKNOWN; UDI NUMBER IS UNKNOWN. COMPLAINANT PART IS NOT EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR MANUFACTURER REVIEW/INVESTIGATION. REPORTER PHONE NUMBER: (B)(6). REPORTER FAX NUMBER: (B)(6). WITHOUT A LOT NUMBER THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS REVIEW COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. PRODUCT WAS NOT RETURNED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT NO CORRECTIVE AND/OR PREVENTATIVE ACTION IS PROPOSED. THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR AND MONITORED VIA POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS MADE AVAILABLE, THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE UPDATED AS APPLICABLE. DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.
THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF THE FOLLOWING JOURNAL ARTICLE: KAO, F.C. ET AL. (2010), TREATMENT OF DISTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES BY MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS PLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF THREE DIFFERENT PLATES: RESULTS AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS, FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, VOL. 1, PAGES 35-40 (TAIWAN) . THIS STUDY AIMED TO COMPARE THE CLINICAL, RADIOLOGIC, AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL BUTTRESS OR DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATES AND LOCKING PLATES FOR TREATING DISPLACED DISTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES. FROM JULY 2003 TO FEBRUARY 2008, 57 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS (17 WOMEN AND 35 MEN; MEAN AGE, 48.8 YEARS) WITH DISTAL METAPHYSEAL TIBIAL FRACTURES WERE TREATED WITH EITHER CONVENTIONAL BUTTRESS PLATES (N=28) OR A LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE (LCP) (N=24). ALL PATIENTS RECEIVED ADEQUATE FOLLOW-UP FOR AT LEAST 12 MONTHS. THE MEAN FOLLOW-UP TIME WAS 25.6 MONTHS (RANGE, 12¿54 MONTHS) FOR THE CONVENTIONAL PLATE GROUP AND 31.6 MONTHS (RANGE, 12¿50 MONTHS) FOR THE LCP GROUP. THE FOLLOWING COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED: 1 PATIENT HAD A POST-OP INFECTION. RECEIVED SURGICAL DEBRIDEMENT AND INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTICS FOR 2 WEEKS AND UNDERWENT SURGERY TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTS AFTER BONE UNION WAS ACHIEVED. 1 PATIENT HAD DELAYED INFECTION. RECEIVED SURGICAL DEBRIDEMENT AND INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTICS FOR 2 WEEKS AND UNDERWENT SURGERY TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTS AFTER BONE UNION WAS ACHIEVED. 5 PATIENTS HAD FAIR RESULTS. THIS REPORT IS FOR AN UNKNOWN SYNTHES LCP CONSTRUCT. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1218431 | UNK - CONSTRUCTS: LCP | PLATE, FIXATION, BONE | HRS | SYNTHES GMBH |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |