Description of Event or Problem · 1
SECOND ISSUE WITH BLOOD BANK'S OTHRO PROVUE ERRONEOUSLY REPORTING A NEGATIVE RESULT WHEN THE REACTION WAS POSITIVE. THE FIRST EVENT WAS IDENTIFIED A MONTH PRIOR WITH A 2+ ANTI-E ON GEL BEING REPORTED AS NEGATIVE. WHEN THE RESULT WAS COMPARED TO RECENT PATIENT HISTORY, IT WAS NOT CONSISTENT WITH PREVIOUSLY POSITIVE ANTIBODY SCREEN -ANTI-E-. ORTHO WAS CALLED TO REPAIR THE EQUIPMENT AND STATED THIS WAS PROBABLY A CAMERA SENSITIVITY ISSUE. THE CAMERA WAS REPORTEDLY "TWEEKED". BLOOD BANK PERSONNEL BEGAN READING EACH GEL CARD AND COMPARING THE VISUAL RESULTS OF THE CAMERA/AUTOMATED REPORT. IT WAS A MONTH LATER A POSITIVE GEL CARD WAS CALLED "NEGATIVE" BY THE PROVUE. THIS TIME THE AUTOMATION MISSED AN ANTI-D -1+0. WE CONTINUE TO MANUALLY MONITOR ALL VISUAL RESULTS AND COMPARE TO PROVUE RESULTS. DATES OF USE: 3 YEARS. DIAGNOSIS OR REASON FOR USE: AUTOMATED BLOOD BANK ANALYZER - ABO, RH, AB SCREENS/ID.