RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE M
Report
- Report Number
- 9681834-2021-00081
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- May 21, 2021
- Report Date
- May 21, 2021
- Manufacturer
- TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA
- Product Code
- DQX
- PMA / PMN Number
- K863138
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
PATIENT IDENTIFIER - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. AGE & DATE OF BIRTH - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. PATIENT SEX - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. WEIGHT - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. ETHNICITY - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. RACE - REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. LOT NUMBER: REQUESTED, NOT PROVIDED. EXPIRATION DATE - UNKNOWN DUE TO UNKNOWN LOT NUMBER. UDI - NOT REQUIRED FOR PRODUCT CODE. IMPLANTED DATE: DEVICE WAS NOT IMPLANTED. EXPLANTED DATE: DEVICE WAS NOT EXPLANTED. PMA/510(K)- K923607, K926214. DEVICE MANUFACTURER DATE - UNKNOWN DUE TO UNKNOWN LOT NUMBER. THE ACTUAL DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED; THEREFORE, AN EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO BE CONDUCTED. THE PRODUCTION LOT NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED BY THE USER FACILITY, WHICH PREVENTED A MEANINGFUL REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD AND SHIPPING INSPECTION RECORDS. A REVIEW OF DHF CONFIRMED THAT THE COATING MATERIAL OF RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE M IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE BIOLOGICAL SAFETY TEST SPECIFIED IN ISO. REGARDING RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE M, A REVIEW OF THE INFORMATION FROM THE MARKET FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO CASE IN WHICH THE COATING AGENT AFFECTED THE HUMAN BODY RESULTING IN ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK. AS FOR THE EFFECTS OF THE COATING AGENT ON THE HUMAN BODY, THE CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP COULD NOT BE CLARIFIED. WITH NO DEVICE RETURN THE EXACT CAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT CANNOT BE DEFINITIVELY DETERMINED BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION. TERUMO MEDICAL PRODUCTS (TMP) (IMPORTER) REGISTRATION NO. (B)(4) IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT ON BEHALF OF ASHITAKA FACTORY OF TERUMO CORPORATION (MANUFACTURER) REGISTRATION NO. (B)(4).
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE M WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK OCCURRED WHEN EVER WAS IMPLEMENTED. THE USER IS INVESTIGATING WHETHER THE CAUSE IS IN THE MATERIALS USED AT THAT TIME. THEY ARE ALSO CONSIDERING THE POSSIBILITY OF THE COATING OF THE RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE. THERE WAS AN ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK, HOWEVER THE PATIENT HAS SINCE RECOVERED AND IS STABLE. THOUGH THERE WAS A HEALTH HAZARD, IT WAS NOT SERIOUS. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS NOT REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 761015 | RADIFOCUS GUIDEWIRE M | WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER | DQX | TERUMO CORPORATION, ASHITAKA | NA | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |