FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

BD SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS FOR BD MAX SYSTEM

MDR report key: 11803346 · Received May 10, 2021

Report

Report Number
1119779-2021-00793
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
May 10, 2021
Date of Event
April 17, 2021
Report Date
July 12, 2021
Manufacturer
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
Product Code
QJR
PMA / PMN Number
NA
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
AS
Reporter Occupation
OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

EUA# (B)(4). A DEVICE EVALUATION IS ANTICIPATED, BUT HAS NOT YET BEGUN. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

INVESTIGATION: THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION FOR DISCREPANT RESULTS WHEN USING THE BD MAX SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS (REF# 44500301) LOT 1033566 WAS PERFORMED BY THE REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS, CUSTOMER¿S DATA ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION OF COMPLAINTS HISTORY. THE COMPLAINT WAS OPENED FOR LOT 1026938 BUT ANALYSIS OF THE RUN PROVIDED SHOWED THAT IT WAS PERFORMED USING LOT 1033566. THEREFORE, LOT 1033566 WAS INVESTIGATED IN THIS REPORT. REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS OF BD MAX SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS INDICATED THAT THE LOT 1033566 WAS MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS AND MET PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS. CUSTOMER COMPLAINED ABOUT ONE N1 POSITIVE SAMPLE WITH BD SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS KIT LOT 1026938 WHICH TESTED NEGATIVE WITH ANOTHER ASSAY (GENEXPERT, CEPHEID) AND PROVIDED RUN #343, PERFORMED ON INSTRUMENT CT2158 FOR INVESTIGATION (INSTEAD OF RUN 334, WHICH WAS THE RUN MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT TEXT, THE SAMPLE ID CORRESPONDED TO THE ONE MENTIONED IN THE COMPLAINT TEXT, AND RUN 343 WAS PRESUMED TO BE THE CORRECT RUN). THE CUSTOMER¿S UDP SETTINGS WERE VERIFIED, AND THE RESULT LOGIC PARAMETERS WERE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BD MAX SARS-COV-2 REAGENT¿S INSTRUCTION FOR USE. MANUAL PCR CURVE ADJUDICATION WAS CONDUCTED ON THE DISCREPANT SAMPLE (RUN #343, POSITION B1). MANUAL CURVE ADJUDICATION HAS LIMITATIONS; VISUAL EXAMINATION OF PCR CURVES FOR LOW SIGNAL AND/OR ABERRANT CURVE GEOMETRY IS AN EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA. ANALYSIS OF THE PCR CURVE SHOW ATYPICAL JAGGED CURVES IN THE RAW PCR SIGNAL, ESPECIALLY IN THE FAM CHANNEL (N1 TARGET), RESULTING IN A POSITIVE RESULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THIS ATYPICAL CURVE COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED, AND THE POSITIVE RESULT OBTAINED CANNOT BE CONFIRMED. OVERALL, BD WAS UNABLE TO CONFIRM THE EXACT CAUSE OF THE CUSTOMER¿S POSITIVE RESULT, HOWEVER NO PRODUCT ISSUE IS SUSPECTED. THERE IS NO INDICATION OF AN INCREASE IN COMPLAINTS FOR DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR THE BD MAX SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS LOT 1033566. THE ROOT CAUSE WAS NOT IDENTIFIED. BD CANNOT CONFIRM THE COMPLAINT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION THAT WAS PERFORMED. BD DID NOT INITIATE A CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION (CAPA). BD APOLOGIZES FOR THE INCONVENIENCE THAT THIS MAY HAVE CAUSED. BD QUALITY WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR TRENDS.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

IT WAS REPORTED WHILE TESTING FOR SARS-COV-2 WITH BD SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM A FALSE POSITIVE WAS OBTAINED. CONFIRMATORY GENE XPERT TESTING WAS NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT. EUA# (B)(4). THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: RUN 334. PATIENT ID (B)(6). N1 DETECTED POS. CT 31.3. CONFIRMED NEG ON GENE XPERT SAME DAY.

Description of Event or Problem · 0

IT WAS REPORTED WHILE TESTING FOR SARS-COV-2 WITH BD SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM A FALSE POSITIVE WAS OBTAINED. CONFIRMATORY GENE XPERT TESTING WAS NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT. EUA# (B)(4). THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: RUN 334, PATIENT ID (B)(6), N1 DETECTED POS, CT 31.3, CONFIRMED NEG ON GENE XPERT SAME DAY.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
695585 BD SARS-COV-2 REAGENTS FOR BD MAX SYSTEM SARS-COV-2 REAGENT KIT QJR BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) 1026938

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1