ONE TOUCH ULTRA METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2008-01310
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 2, 2008
- Date of Event
- June 11, 2008
- Report Date
- June 12, 2008
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN, INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- OH, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
LIFESCAN HAS REQUESTED THE RETURN OF THE SUBJECT METER AND STRIPS FOR EVAL, BUT HAS NOT YET RECEIVED THEM. IF EITHER THE METER OR STRIPS ARE RETURNED, LIFESCAN WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND, IF EITHER THE METER OR STRIPS DO NOT PASS INSPECTION, LIFESCAN WILL INFORM FDA OF THE RESULTS IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
IN 2008, A REPORTER/LAYPERSON (DAUGHTER) SPOKE WITH A CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE, CCA, REGARDING THE PT/LAYPERSON'S ONE TOUCH ULTRA METER. THE REPORTER ALLEGED THAT THE PT'S BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS WHEN TESTED WERE INACCURATELY ERRATIC IN 2008, AND ABOUT TWO DAYS LATER, THE PT RECEIVED TREATMENT FROM AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL TEAM, EMT. THIS SENIOR MEDICAL AFFAIRS SPECIALIST IS CLASSIFYING THE COMPLAINT BASED UPON THE INFO GIVEN TO THE CCA. SINCE THERE IS NO ANSWER AT THE NUMBER PROVIDED, A LETTER WILL BE SENT, RESULTS ARE IN MG/DL. BECAUSE OF PERCEIVED VARIANCES (RESULTS NOT PROVIDED) THAT BEGAN IN 2008, THE PT REPORTEDLY TESTED OR WAS TESTED EVERY COUPLE OF HOURS. TYPICALLY THE SCHEDULE IS THREE TIMES A DAY. THE REPORTER ALLEGED THAT AT ABOUT THREE DAYS LATER, THE PT OBTAINED RESULTS OF AROUND 157 AND THEN 99 ONE HOUR LATER WITH NO EXERCISE, MEDICATION OR FOOD IN BETWEEN. RESULTS OF 151 AND 91 WERE FOUND IN METER'S MEMORY. THE PT'S UNKNOWN INSULIN REGIME DOES NOT VARY BASED UPON METER RESULTS. ABOUT TWO DAYS LATER AT 11 P.M., EMT WAS REPORTEDLY CALLED. THE REPORTER DID NOT INDICATE WHY, OR WHETHER THE PT WAS DISPLAYING SYMPTOMS OF ANY KIND. THE REPORTER STATED, "HER METER WAS REALLY LOW." THE REPORTER DID NOT SPECIFY WHOSE METER SHE WAS REFERRING TO, THE PT'S OR THE EMT'S. EMT REPORTEDLY GAVE THE PT ORAL GLUCOSE, AND OBTAINED "126" ON THEIR OWN METER. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE "126" WAS OBTAINED BEFORE OR AFTER THE ORAL GLUCOSE WAS ADMINISTERED. THE CCA DISCOVERED THAT THE PT'S METER WAS CODED INCORRECTLY; METER CODE 43 AND TEST STRIPS CODE 1. DUE TO THE WIDE DISCREPANCY, BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS WOULD BE INACCURATE. THE CCA WAS UNABLE TO PERFORM A CONTROL SOLUTION TEST BECAUSE THE PT HAD NON-LIFESCAN CONTROL. ALTHOUGH THE REPORTER DID NOT ALLEGE HARM DUE TO THE PRODUCT AND ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THE PRODUCT MALFUNCTIONED, THE COMPLAINT IS CLASSIFIED AS AN ADVERSE EVENT DUE TO TREATMENT GIVEN BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, AFTER THE REPORTED ISSUE, POSSIBLY BECAUSE THE PT OR A FAMILY MEMBER HAD MISCODED THE METER.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE TOUCH ULTRA METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN, INC. | NA | 2772555 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86 YR | Life Threatening |