ESSURE
Report
- Report Number
- 2951250-2020-13653
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 3, 2020
- Date of Event
- June 13, 2014
- Report Date
- July 5, 2021
- Manufacturer
- BAYER PHARMA AG
- Product Code
- HHS
- UDI-DI
- 10888853003051
- PMA / PMN Number
- P020014
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AR, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 863668) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDED CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON (B)(6) 2014, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED), 2 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER INSERTION OF ESSURE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. THE REPORTER COMMENTED: DEVICE DEPLOYED IN R TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. DEVICE DEPLOYED IN L TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 28-JUN-2021: MR RECEIVED : REPORTER INFORMATION, RACE INFORMATION, OTHER RELEVANT HISTORY AND LOT NUMBER ADDED. ESSURE REMOVAL UPDATED WITH PELVIC PAIN FEMALE. RCC UPDATED. WE RECEIVED A LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. A TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WILL BE CONDUCTED, INCLUDING A BATCH REVIEW, AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA; SHOULD ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION, THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 863668-NOT VALID) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDED CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. THE REPORTER COMMENTED: DEVICE DEPLOYED IN R TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. DEVICE DEPLOYED IN L TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. LOT# 863668 REPORTED IS NOT VALID. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 2-JUL-2021: UPDATE OF INFORMATION (BATCH IS NOT VALID). WE RECEIVED AN INVALID LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('ESSURE REMOVAL') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON (B)(6) 2014, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED), 2 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER INSERTION OF ESSURE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVED). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 4-SEP-2020: QUALITY SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL') IN A FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TO REMOVE ESSURE). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 954881 | ESSURE | TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE | HHS | BAYER PHARMA AG | ESS305 | 863668-NOT VALID | 10888853003051 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 YR | Other| R |