FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

ESSURE

MDR report key: 10486585 · Received September 3, 2020

Report

Report Number
2951250-2020-13653
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
September 3, 2020
Date of Event
June 13, 2014
Report Date
July 5, 2021
Manufacturer
BAYER PHARMA AG
Product Code
HHS
UDI-DI
10888853003051
PMA / PMN Number
P020014
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
AR, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 863668) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDED CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON (B)(6) 2014, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED), 2 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER INSERTION OF ESSURE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. THE REPORTER COMMENTED: DEVICE DEPLOYED IN R TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. DEVICE DEPLOYED IN L TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 28-JUN-2021: MR RECEIVED : REPORTER INFORMATION, RACE INFORMATION, OTHER RELEVANT HISTORY AND LOT NUMBER ADDED. ESSURE REMOVAL UPDATED WITH PELVIC PAIN FEMALE. RCC UPDATED. WE RECEIVED A LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. A TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WILL BE CONDUCTED, INCLUDING A BATCH REVIEW, AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA; SHOULD ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION, THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 863668-NOT VALID) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDED CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY.). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. THE REPORTER COMMENTED: DEVICE DEPLOYED IN R TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. DEVICE DEPLOYED IN L TUBE WITH 1 COILS VISUALIZED. LOT# 863668 REPORTED IS NOT VALID. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 2-JUL-2021: UPDATE OF INFORMATION (BATCH IS NOT VALID). WE RECEIVED AN INVALID LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('ESSURE REMOVAL') IN A 33-YEAR-OLD FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON (B)(6) 2014, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED), 2 YEARS 6 MONTHS AFTER INSERTION OF ESSURE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVED). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 4-SEP-2020: QUALITY SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL') IN A FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (TO REMOVE ESSURE). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2014. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
954881 ESSURE TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE HHS BAYER PHARMA AG ESS305 863668-NOT VALID 10888853003051

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 33 YR Other| R