ONE TOUCH PROFILE METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2008-00571
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- April 15, 2008
- Report Date
- March 20, 2008
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN, INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- UT, US
- Reporter Occupation
- LAY USER/PATIENT
Narratives
LIFESCAN HAS REQUESTED THE RETURN OF THE SUBJECT METER, TEST STRIPS, AND CONTROL SOLUTION FOR EVALUATION, BUT HAS NOT YET RECEIVED THEM. IF EITHER THE METER, STRIPS AND/OR CONTROL SOLUTION ARE RETURNED, LIFESCAN WILL EVALUATE THEM AND, IF EITHER THE METER, STRIPS, OR CONTROL SOLUTION DO NOT PASS INSPECTION, LIFESCAN WILL INFORM FDA OF THE RESULTS IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
IN 2008, THE LAY-USER/PT CONTACTED LIFESCAN ALLEGING THAT A ONE TOUCH PROFILE DEVICE HAD AN INCORRECT METER AVERAGE ISSUE. THE MEDICAL AFFAIRS SPECIALIST (MAS) SPOKE TO THE PT ON THE FOLLOWING MONTH, TO OBTAIN/VERIFY INFO. THE PT TESTS HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE 4 TIMES A DAY. HE TESTS BEFORE EACH MEAL AND AT BEDTIME. HE TAKES SLIDING-SCALE NPH INSULIN TWICE A DAY BASED ON HIS METER READINGS. HE ALSO TAKES SLIDING-SCALE HUMALOG INSULIN BASED ON HIS METER READINGS. THE PT INDICATED THAT THE ALLEGED METER ISSUE STARTED ABOUT 2 YRS AGO. HE DOES NOT UTILIZE HIS METER AVERAGES TO BASE HIS INSULIN REGIMEN. ABOUT 2 MONTHS AGO, THE PT CLAIMED THAT HE SUFFERED A HYPOGLYCEMIC EPISODE AT 1 AM. HE COULD NOT RECALL WHAT HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE READING WAS THAT NIGHT BEFORE GOING TO BED. HOWEVER, THE PT MENTIONED THAT POSSIBLY HIS METER READING WAS INACCURATELY HIGH AND THAT HE TOOK TOO MUCH SLIDING-SCALE NPH AND REGULAR INSULIN. HE FURTHER ADDED THAT POSSIBLY HE DIDN'T EAT MUCH THAT DAY OR EXERCISED BEFORE GOING TO BED. AT 1 AM THAT MORNING, THE PT WOKE UP FEELING "A LITTLE SHAKY." WHEN HE TRIED TO GET OUT OF BED, HE APPARENTLY "PASSED OUT." HIS MOTHER TREATED HIM BY GIVING HIM JUICE WHICH RELIEVED HIS SYMPTOMS. WHEN HE STARTED FEELING BETTER, THE PT TESTED HIS BLOOD GLUCOSE ON THE REPORTED METER AND GOT "35 MG/DL." HE DENIED SEEKING OR RECEIVING MEDICAL TREATMENT FROM A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER. HE WAS NOT TESTED ON ANOTHER DEVICE DURING THE TIME OF CONCERN. THE METER WAS REPLACED. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED DUE TO THE FOLLOWING CONCLUSION: THE PT CLAIMED THAT HE POSSIBLY DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA AFTER OBTAINING AN INACCURATELY HIGH RESULT ON THE METER. THE PT ALLEGED THAT HE TOOK TOO MUCH INSULIN BASED ON THE METER READING.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE TOUCH PROFILE METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN, INC. | NA | NA |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 YR | Life Threatening| R |