ESSURE
Report
- Report Number
- 2951250-2020-07807
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 18, 2020
- Report Date
- August 19, 2020
- Manufacturer
- BAYER PHARMA AG
- Product Code
- HHS
- UDI-DI
- 10888853003051
- PMA / PMN Number
- P020014
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NY, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('REMOVAL') IN A FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVAL WITH OOPHORECTOMY). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 5-JUN-2020: QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN AN ADULT FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 802744) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S CONCURRENT CONDITIONS INCLUDED UTERINE BLEEDING. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVAL WITH OOPHORECTOMY). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS (NORMAL RANGES ARE PROVIDED IN PARENTHESIS IF AVAILABLE): HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAM - ON (B)(6) 2011: IMPRESSION: THIS IS A NON-DIAGNOSTIC STUDY AS THERE IS NO RADIOOPAQUE CONTRAST OPACIFICATION OF THE UTERUS. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON 19-AUG-2020: QUALITY SAFETY EVALUATION OF PRODUCT TECHNICAL COMPLAINT. WE RECEIVED A LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. A TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED, INCLUDING A BATCH REVIEW, AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA; SHOULD ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION, THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF PELVIC PAIN ('PELVIC PAIN') IN AN ADULT FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE (BATCH NO. 802744) INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. THE PATIENT'S CONCURRENT CONDITIONS INCLUDED UTERINE BLEEDING. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PELVIC PAIN (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVAL WITH OOPHORECTOMY). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE PELVIC PAIN OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED PELVIC PAIN TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. DIAGNOSTIC RESULTS (NORMAL RANGES ARE PROVIDED IN PARENTHESIS IF AVAILABLE): HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAM - ON (B)(6) 2011: IMPRESSION: THIS IS A NON-DIAGNOSTIC STUDY AS THERE IS NO RADIOOPAQUE CONTRAST OPACIFICATION OF THE UTERUS.. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT MOST RECENT FOLLOW-UP INFORMATION INCORPORATED ABOVE INCLUDES: ON (B)(6) 2020: MR RECEIVED. LOT NUMBER WAS ADDED. PREVIOUSLY ADDED EVENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL REPLACED TO PELVIC PAIN. REPORTER, CONCURRENT CONDITIONS , LAB DATA WERE ADDED. WE RECEIVED A LOT NUMBER IN THIS CASE. A TECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WILL BE CONDUCTED, INCLUDING A BATCH REVIEW, AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA; SHOULD ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION BECOME AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION, THIS WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE WAS REPORTED BY A LAWYER AND DESCRIBES THE OCCURRENCE OF MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL ('REMOVAL') IN A FEMALE PATIENT WHO HAD ESSURE INSERTED FOR FEMALE STERILISATION. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE PATIENT HAD ESSURE INSERTED. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL (SERIOUSNESS CRITERIA MEDICALLY SIGNIFICANT AND INTERVENTION REQUIRED). THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH SURGERY (ESSURE REMOVAL WITH OOPHORECTOMY). ESSURE WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2019. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, THE MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL OUTCOME WAS UNKNOWN. THE REPORTER CONSIDERED MEDICAL DEVICE REMOVAL TO BE RELATED TO ESSURE. QUALITY-SAFETY EVALUATION OF PTC: UNABLE TO CONFIRM COMPLAINT. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A REVIEW OF OUR COMPLAINT RECORDS AND OTHER RELEVANT DATA WAS CONDUCTED; ANY NEW AND REPORTABLE INFORMATION THAT BECOMES AVAILABLE FROM OUR INVESTIGATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN A SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 528940 | ESSURE | TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE | HHS | BAYER PHARMA AG | ESS305 | 802744 | 10888853003051 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other| R |