510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Table Mounted Miniaturized Electromechanical Surgical System
General, Plastic Surgery
A table-mounted miniaturized electromechanical surgical system is a software-controlled electromechanical platform with surgical-table-mounted patient/device interfaces designed to allow qualified surgeons to perform minimally invasive surgical procedures by inserting compact, miniaturized electromechanical arms bearing surgical instruments into body cavities. It is classified as FDA Class II (510(k) required), meaning manufacturers must demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device before marketing. The product code is SAB under regulation 878.4962, in the General and Plastic Surgery specialty. The device is not an implant and is not life-sustaining.
510(k) Clearances
1 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.