510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Multiple Use Blood Lancet For Multiple Patient Use
General, Plastic Surgery
The Multiple Use Blood Lancet for Multiple Patient Use is a blood-sampling lancet with a reusable base and single-use blades that is intended for use across multiple patients, which introduces significantly elevated infection and cross-contamination risks compared to single-patient devices. Due to this elevated risk profile, it is classified as FDA Class 3 under regulation 878.4850, requiring Premarket Approval (PMA) and falling under the General and Plastic Surgery specialty. This classification reflects the heightened safety concerns of multi-patient reuse. The device is not an implant and not life-sustaining.
No 510(k) clearances found for "QRM". Try a different K-number, product code, or device name.
What is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.