Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: QQU FDA class 2

Digital Therapy Device For Amblyopia

Ophthalmic

View full classification →

The Digital Therapy Device for Amblyopia is an ophthalmic device that incorporates dichoptic visual presentations on displays through therapeutic algorithms to treat amblyopia (lazy eye) or to improve visual acuity in patients with amblyopia, providing a digital alternative or complement to traditional patching therapy. This device is classified as FDA Class 2, requiring 510(k) clearance, under regulation 886.5500 in the Ophthalmic specialty. It carries product code QQU and is not an implant and not life-sustaining.

510(k) Clearances

5 matches
K Number
Device Name
Luminopia
Luminopia
Luminopia One
CureSight-CS100
Luminopia One

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched