Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: QMW FDA class 2

Coronary Artery Disease Risk Indicator From Acoustic Heart Signals

Cardiovascular

View full classification →

The Coronary Artery Disease Risk Indicator from Acoustic Heart Signals is a cardiovascular device that records heart sounds including murmurs and vibrations to calculate a patient-specific risk score for the presence of coronary artery disease, serving as an aid in cardiac analysis and diagnosis. This device is classified as FDA Class 2, requiring 510(k) clearance, under regulation 870.1420 in the Cardiovascular specialty. It carries product code QMW and is not an implant, not life-sustaining, and not GMP exempt.

510(k) Clearances

1 matches
K Number
Device Name
CADScor System

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched