510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Device To Detect Antigens Of Biothreat Microbial Agents In Human Clinical Specimens
Microbiology
The Device To Detect Antigens Of Biothreat Microbial Agents In Human Clinical Specimens is an in vitro diagnostic device intended for the detection of antigens from microbial agents classified as biothreat agents in specimens from patients with signs and symptoms of infection or known/suspected exposure, and may also be used for cadaver testing when a cadaver constitutes a source of human-to-human transmission. It is classified as FDA Class 2, requiring 510(k) clearance, regulated under 21 CFR 866.4002 within the Microbiology medical specialty. The product code is QID, and this device is flagged as life-sustaining due to its role in diagnosing potentially fatal biothreat infections.
510(k) Clearances
1 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.