510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures
Cardiovascular
The Temporary Catheter, Embolic Protection, Transcatheter Intracardiac Procedures is a cardiovascular device used to provide embolic protection during transcatheter intracardiac procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), capturing debris and emboli that may be dislodged during the procedure to reduce the risk of stroke or other embolic complications. It is classified as FDA Class II under regulation 21 CFR 870.1251, requiring 510(k) premarket notification clearance and compliance with general and special controls. The product code is PUM and it falls under the Cardiovascular medical specialty. It is not flagged as an implant or life-sustaining device.
510(k) Clearances
2 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.