Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: PCL FDA class 1

Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Rubeola Igm

Microbiology

View full classification →

The Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Rubeola IgM is a microbiology in vitro diagnostic device used for the qualitative detection of measles-specific IgM antibodies in serum or plasma, supporting the diagnosis of active measles (rubeola) infection. It falls under the Microbiology medical specialty and is classified as a Class 1 device under regulation 866.3520, subject to general controls only, which may include GMP exemption considerations. Class 1 reflects the relatively lower risk of this type of serological assay. It is not an implant and is not life-sustaining.

510(k) Clearances

1 matches
K Number
Device Name
CAPTIA MEASLES IGM

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched