Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: OOG FDA class 2

Knee Arthroplasty Implantation System

Orthopedic

View full classification →

The Knee Arthroplasty Implantation System (product code OOG) is a Class 2 orthopedic device regulated under 21 CFR 888.3560 in the Orthopedic specialty (OR), cleared via 510(k). It is a surgical instrument system intended to assist in the implantation of specific knee arthroplasty devices, including guiding alignment, making bone cuts, selecting and sizing implant components, and positioning or orienting components during total or partial knee replacement surgery. The device is a surgical tool rather than an implant itself, and is not life-sustaining.

510(k) Clearances

2 matches
K Number
Device Name
United Orthopedic Knee Patient Specific Instrumentation
Triathlon AS-1

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched