Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: MJT FDA class 3

Prosthesis, Shoulder, Humeral (Bipolar Hemi-Shoulder) Metal/Polymer, Cemented Or Uncemented

Unknown

View full classification →

The Bipolar Hemi-Shoulder Prosthesis (Metal/Polymer, Cemented or Uncemented) is a partial shoulder replacement implant consisting of a humeral stem and a dual-articulation bipolar head component used to resurface the humeral side of the glenohumeral joint, typically in patients with proximal humeral fractures or avascular necrosis when glenoid replacement is not indicated. As a Class 3 implantable device, it requires Premarket Approval (PMA) given the high risks associated with load-bearing joint implants. It carries an implant flag, and no regulation number or medical specialty code is recorded.

510(k) Clearances

3 matches
K Number
Device Name
OSTEONICS SOLAR SHOULDER BIPOLAR SYSTEM
BUECHEL-PAPPAS MODULAR SALVAGE STEM
BIPOLAR SHOULDER PROSTHESIS-SHELL(RD-113130/33, BIANGULAR MODULAR HEAD(RD-113101/41/42,BIOMODULAR MODULAR HEAD(RD-113143

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched