Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: MDI FDA class 2

Prosthesis, Rib Replacement

Orthopedic

View full classification →

The expandable rib prosthesis is an orthopedic implant used in children with or at risk of Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome to mechanically stabilize or correct thoracic deformities, allowing the chest and lungs to grow normally; the device attaches perpendicularly to the patient's natural ribs and lumbar vertebrae. It is classified as FDA Class II under 21 CFR 888.3070 within the Orthopedic specialty, requiring 510(k) premarket clearance. The product code is MDI and it carries an implant flag reflecting its surgical placement. Full GMP compliance is required.

510(k) Clearances

2 matches
K Number
Device Name
RESPONSE™ Rib and Pelvic System
Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched