510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Artificial Heart
Unknown
The Artificial Heart is a fully implantable mechanical device designed to replace or support the function of a failing natural heart, intended for patients with end-stage heart failure who are not candidates for transplant or as a bridge to transplantation. It is classified as a Class 3 (highest risk) device, the most stringent regulatory category, requiring Premarket Approval (PMA) from the FDA due to the critical life-supporting nature of this technology. The product code is LOZ; no specific regulation number is on file, and the medical specialty is not categorized in this record. This device carries the implant flag, indicating it is intended to be surgically placed inside the body.
No 510(k) clearances found for "LOZ". Try a different K-number, product code, or device name.
What is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.