Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: HWQ FDA class 1

Passer

Orthopedic

View full classification →

An orthopedic passer is a handheld instrument used to thread or guide sutures, wires, or cables around or through bone and tissue structures during orthopedic repair procedures. It is classified as an FDA Class 1 device under 21 CFR 888.4540, indicating minimal risk subject to general controls. Product code HWQ falls under the Orthopedic medical specialty.

510(k) Clearances

9 matches
K Number
Device Name
MITEK SUTURE RETROGRADER
ACUFEX PASSING PINS AND SURGICAL WIRE
SOFT TISSUE EXPANDER
MENISCUS MENDER II LOOP
VICO MICRO SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS
SOFT-TISSUE INSTRUMENT
SLOTTED SOFT-TISSUE INSTRUMENT
SILASTIC TENDON PASSER H.P.
ROTH-KENNEDY PASSER

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched