510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Reader, Zone, Automated
Microbiology
The Automated Zone Reader is a microbiology instrument that uses optical sensing or image analysis to automatically interpret and record antimicrobial susceptibility test results by measuring inhibition zones around antibiotic discs on culture plates, reducing the variability of manual reading. It is classified as FDA Class 1, the lowest risk category, and requires a 510(k) premarket notification before marketing based on its assigned submission type. The product code is KZK, regulated under 21 CFR 866.2850, in the Microbiology medical specialty. This device is eligible for third-party review under the FDA's accredited persons program.
510(k) Clearances
3 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.