510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Lamp, Infrared, Non Heating
Physical Medicine
A Non-Heating Infrared Lamp is a Physical Medicine device that emits infrared radiation at wavelengths or intensities that do not produce a significant thermal effect in tissue, used for purposes such as vascular visualization, photobiomodulation therapy, or non-thermal phototherapy applications. It is classified as FDA Class 2, representing moderate risk, meaning it requires a 510(k) premarket notification demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device before marketing. The product code is IOB, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5500, within the Physical Medicine medical specialty. This device is eligible for third party review, meaning the 510(k) submission may be reviewed by an FDA-accredited third party organization.
510(k) Clearances
6 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.