Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: KAC FDA class 1

Tube, Laryngectomy

Ear, Nose, Throat

View full classification →

A laryngectomy tube is a device used to maintain an open airway following surgical removal of all or part of the larynx, typically inserted into the stoma to facilitate breathing after a laryngectomy procedure. It is classified as an FDA Class 1 device, the lowest risk category, subject to general controls only and not requiring premarket clearance. Product code KAC is regulated under 21 CFR 874.4420 in the Ear, Nose, Throat medical specialty. No special flags apply to this device.

510(k) Clearances

4 matches
K Number
Device Name
BARTON-MAYO TRACHEOSTOMA BUTTON
LARYNGECTOMY TUBE
SHILEY LARYNGECTOMY TUBE
NORTHWESTERN VOICE RESTORATION KIT

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched