Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: HQW FDA class 2

Clip, Tantalum, Ophthalmic

Ophthalmic

View full classification →

An Ophthalmic Tantalum Clip is a small surgically implanted metallic clip made from tantalum used in ophthalmic surgery, typically as a radiopaque marker applied to the sclera to mark anatomical locations or to assist in radiotherapy planning for intraocular tumors. This device is FDA Class 2 (moderate risk), subject to general controls and special controls. It carries product code HQW and is regulated under 21 CFR 886.3100, within the Ophthalmic medical specialty. It is classified as an implant.

510(k) Clearances

3 matches
K Number
Device Name
GRIESHABER RETINAL TACK AND SUTHERLAND TACK FORCEP
RETINAL TAAK
DOUBLE & SINGLE TANTALUM CLIPS

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched