Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: EFN FDA class 1

Cotton, Roll

Dental

View full classification →

The Cotton Roll is a dental device consisting of a cylindrical roll of absorbent cotton used to isolate teeth from saliva, retract soft tissues, and maintain a dry field during dental procedures. It is classified as FDA Class 1, the lowest risk category, and is GMP exempt, meaning it is also exempt from most good manufacturing practice requirements. The product code is EFN and the applicable regulation is 21 CFR 872.6050, under the Dental medical specialty.

510(k) Clearances

14 matches
K Number
Device Name
STRUNG DENTAL ROLLS
MEDGROUP ENTERPRISES COTTON GAUZE SPONGES-NON STER
COTTON ROLLS, NON-STERILE
DENTAL COTTON ROLLS, STERILE AND NON-STERILE
COTTON FILLED GAUZE SPONGES 2 X 2
TELEDYNE DENSCO DRY TIPS SALIVA ABSORB-
DENTAL COTTON ROLLS
SCHEIN COTTON ROLLS, NON-STERILE
STERILE COTTON ROLLS #3, 1 1/2
STERILE DENTAL ROLL
HOYT COTTON ROLLS
COTTON ROLLS
COTTON ROLL COMPRESSION CAPS
DISP. ABSORBENT COMPRESSED FIBRE WAFER

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched