510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Bathophenanthroline, Colorimetry, Iron (Non-Heme)
Clinical Chemistry
The Bathophenanthroline Colorimetry Iron (Non-Heme) Test is a clinical chemistry device that measures non-heme iron concentration in biological specimens using the bathophenanthroline colorimetric method, in which iron reacts with the chelating agent to form a red-colored complex proportional to iron content, used in the evaluation of iron deficiency and iron overload conditions. It is classified as FDA Class 1 (lowest risk), subject only to general controls, and is exempt from premarket notification. The product code is CFM, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1410, within the Clinical Chemistry medical specialty. No special flags apply to this device.
510(k) Clearances
21 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.