Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: LCE FDA class 2

Radioimmunoassay, Netilmicin (I-125)

Clinical Toxicology

View full classification →

Radioimmunoassay for netilmicin using iodine-125 tracer is a laboratory test method used in clinical toxicology to measure serum levels of netilmicin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic that requires therapeutic drug monitoring to minimize the risk of toxicity. It is classified as FDA Class 2, requiring 510(k) premarket notification. The product code is LCE, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3450, in the Clinical Toxicology specialty. No special risk flags apply.

510(k) Clearances

6 matches
K Number
Device Name
EMIT NETILMICIN ASSAY
AMES TDA NETILMICIN TEST & SERUM
NETILMICIN FLUORESCENT IMMUNOASSAY
TDX NETILMICIN
MACRO-VUE CARD TEST, NETILMICIN
EMIT AND NETILMICIN ASSAY

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched