Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: IXF FDA class 1

Test-Pattern, Radiographic

Radiology

View full classification →

A radiographic test pattern is a phantom or resolution target used to evaluate and verify the spatial resolution, contrast, and other performance characteristics of radiographic imaging systems as part of quality assurance testing. It is classified as FDA Class 1, the lowest risk category, subject only to general controls. The product code is IXF, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1940, within the Radiology medical specialty. This device is GMP exempt.

510(k) Clearances

5 matches
K Number
Device Name
TISSUE-EQUIVALENT BREAST SIMULATOR
DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANTIOGRAPHY PHANTOM 76-700/711
TISSUE MIMICKING ULTRASOUND PHANTOMS
DOPPLER PHANTOM FLOW CONTROL SYS
1.5` FOCAL SPOT RESOLUTION PATTERN

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched