Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: KSG FDA class 2

Media, Potentiating For In Vitro Diagnostic Use

Hematology

View full classification →

This device is a potentiating medium for in vitro diagnostic use, such as low-ionic-strength solution (LISS) or albumin, used in blood bank serology to enhance the detection of clinically significant antibodies during antibody identification and compatibility testing. It is classified as FDA Class 2, indicating moderate risk, and requires 510(k) premarket notification. The product code is KSG, regulated under 21 CFR 864.9600 within the Hematology specialty. No special flags apply.

510(k) Clearances

13 matches
K Number
Device Name
ELUTION SOLUTION
EM-X
PENTEX BOVINE ALBUMIN 30% SOLUTION
BOVINE ALBUMIN 22% & 30% SOLUTIONS
ORTHO ANTIBODY ENHANCEMENT SOLUTION
LOW IONIC STRENGTH SOLUTION (LISS)
LO-ION
DADE LOW IONIC STRENGTH SOLUITION (LISS)
LISS REAGENT
ORTHO LOW IONIC SOLUTION
EM-V
LOW IIONIC STRENGTH SOLUTION
SPECT RIM (LISS)

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched