Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: POK FDA class 2

Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer

Radiology

View full classification →

The Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Software For Lesions Suspicious For Cancer (product code POK) is a Class 2 radiology device intended to assist users in characterizing lesions identified on acquired medical images, regulated under 892.2060. It requires 510(k) clearance and falls within the radiology medical specialty. The device is not an implant and is not life-sustaining.

510(k) Clearances

18 matches
K Number
Device Name
StrokeSENS ASPECTS Software Application
Fetal EchoScan (v1.1)
Sonio Suspect
Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS
Koios DS
Fetal EchoScan
EchoSolv AS
AISAP Cardio V1.0
CINA-ASPECTS
Rapid ASPECTS (v3)
Brainomix 360 e-ASPECTS
Avenda Health AI Prostate Cancer Planning Software
Koios DS
Optellum Virtual Nodule Clinic, Optellum software, Optellum platform
EchoGo Pro
Rapid ASPECTS
Koios DS for Breast
QuantX

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched