510(k) Predicate Finder
Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.
Let the assistant find your predicates
Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.
Free to try · every answer cites its records
Hip Prosthesis, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer, + Additive, Porous, Uncemented
Orthopedic
The Hip Prosthesis, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer, + Additive, Porous, Uncemented (product code OQG) is an orthopedic implant used for total hip arthroplasty. It is indicated for conditions including non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease such as osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, correction of functional deformity, treatment of proximal femur fractures unmanageable by other techniques, and revision procedures where prior treatments have failed. As an FDA Class 2 device under regulation 888.3358, it requires 510(k) premarket clearance and falls within the Orthopedic specialty. The device is flagged as an implant and is available for both cemented and uncemented use. It is not life-sustaining.
510(k) Clearances
20 matchesWhat is a Predicate Device?
A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.
Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.
Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.