Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Let the assistant find your predicates

Describe your device and the Research Assistant searches 510(k)s, compares intended use, and drafts a predicate shortlist — with citations.

Free to try · every answer cites its records

Product Code: HPM FDA class 2

Locator, Metal, Electronic

Ophthalmic

View full classification →

An Electronic Metal Locator is a diagnostic ophthalmic device that uses electronic detection technology to locate metallic foreign bodies within or around the eye, assisting the surgeon in planning and executing the removal of intraocular or intraorbital metallic fragments. This device is FDA Class 2 (moderate risk), requiring premarket notification (510(k)) before marketing. It carries product code HPM and is regulated under 21 CFR 886.4400, within the Ophthalmic medical specialty.

510(k) Clearances

4 matches
K Number
Device Name
PEDIATRIC INGESTASCAN
SHADOW MEDAL LOCATOR
PMT METAL LOCATOR, MODEL 3630-1
LOCATOR, FOREIGN BODY

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched