Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: FZW FDA class 1

Expander, Surgical, Skin Graft

General, Plastic Surgery

View full classification →

The Expander, Surgical, Skin Graft (product code FZW) is a surgical instrument used to expand harvested skin grafts by creating a mesh pattern, allowing the graft to cover a larger surface area during reconstructive or plastic surgery procedures. It is classified as FDA Class 1, the lowest risk level, requiring only general controls with no premarket notification. The device is regulated under 21 CFR 878.4800 in the General, Plastic Surgery specialty (SU). No special flags apply to this device.

510(k) Clearances

8 matches
K Number
Device Name
LB MEDICAL INFLATABLE TISSUE ELEVATOR/EXPANDER SYSTEM
BIRCOLL BALLOON DISSECTOR
SPACEMAKER SURGICALBALLOON DISSECTOR/EXPANDER
AESCULAP SKIN GRAFT MESHER
INAMED RUIZ-COHEN INTRAOPERATIVE TISSUE EXPANDER
SURGITEK INTRA-SPAN INTRAOPERATIVE TISSUE EXPANDER
MENTOR RAPID-SPAN (TM) TISSUE EXPANDER
CUI, VERSAFIL(TM), STE(TM) TISSUE EXPANDER

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched