Tool · 510(k)

510(k) Predicate Finder

Find potential predicate devices for your 510(k) submission. Enter a K-number to find all clearances with the same product code, a three-letter product code to browse clearances directly, or search by device name.

Product Code: DAS FDA class 1

Igg (Fc Fragment Specific), Antigen, Antiserum, Control

Immunology

View full classification →

This is an immunological reagent kit for detecting the Fc fragment of immunoglobulin G (IgG), the crystallizable region of the antibody that mediates effector functions such as complement activation and binding to Fc receptors. The kit includes antigen, antiserum, and control components for immunochemical analysis. It is classified as FDA Class 1, the lowest risk category, subject to general controls only and not requiring premarket notification. The product code is DAS, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5530, within the Immunology specialty.

510(k) Clearances

8 matches
K Number
Device Name
PELICALSS HUMAN IGG SUBCLASS NEPHLOMETRIC ARRAY KIT
HUMAN IGG SUBCLASSES NEPHELOMETRIC BNA KIT
HUMAN IGG SUBCLASSES ELISA COMBI KIT
HUMAN IGG SUBCLASSES RID COMBI KIT (MODIFICATION)
HUMAN (IGG) SUBCLASS (EIA) KIT
ANTISERUM TO HUMAN IG G FC FRAGMENTS
ANTISERUM TO HUMAN FC
AMINOGLYCOSIDE CONTROLS

What is a Predicate Device?

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that a new 510(k) applicant uses to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The FDA's 510(k) pathway requires manufacturers to show that their device has the same intended use and similar technological characteristics as one or more predicate devices already cleared for commercial distribution.

Finding the right predicate is a critical step in 510(k) strategy. Manufacturers typically search for cleared devices with the same FDA product code, which groups devices by their intended use and regulatory classification. This tool helps you identify potential predicates by browsing all clearances within a product code.

Note that predicate devices must be legally marketed — they cannot be devices that were cleared but never commercialized, or devices subject to a mandatory recall. The determination of substantial equivalence considers intended use, technological characteristics, and performance data.

Popular Product Codes

Commonly searched